This is dedicated all of you voting in the S.C. Primary tomorrow
Comments or questions? Contact BosGuy
- Follow BosGuy on WordPress.com
Find A Post on BosGuy
Fill in the blank… Sen. Rick Santorum shows the rest of the Republican Presidential candidates how to <fill in the blank> (get creative).
What a hilarious image of Sen. Rick Santorum responding to a question at the CNN Republican Presidential Debate. Looks as if he’s really enjoying himself.
The hilarious photo was tweeted from @ryanjreilly
Can the world live without Wikipedia for a day? Anyone who visits this site today will see that the site has gone dark to protest anti-piracy legislation which frankly threatens anyone who puts content on the web. As a result you’ll notice sympathy moves by some of the web’s most popular sites.
Bills Stop Online Piracy Act in the House and the Protect IP Act in the Senate backed by major media companies is meant to discourage online piracy but gives media companies too much power to shut down websites. Today’s NYT’s article explains these bills and the response from bloggers, technology leaders and major sites like Google and Wikipedia to raise awareness and encourage people like you and me to speak out against this bad legislation.
As a show of sympathy I will not post any other articles today, and I hope you will lend your voice to let your US Congressmen / Senators know that you oppose this legislation.
Sign the petition: Take Action
Today is Martin Luther King Jr. day in the US. Although I am working, most schools, banks, hospitals and public sector employees have the day off. MLK was a leading figure in America’s civil rights movement and he was assassinated in the spring of 1968 because of his beliefs. MLK adopted Gandhi’s tactics of peaceful non cooperation which confounded his antagonists, and he made the civil rights movement a defining moment in 20th century US history.
When I think of America’s contributions and most salient exports, I think MLK and the Civil Rights movement is perhaps one of our most important. It is men like MLK, the values they cherished and would not compromise that make me proud. Looking to the future I wonder where America’s next great visionaries reside; who’s dream will ignite the imagination of a nation and export their hope for greater equality, peace and love through out the world as Dr. King did?
Below is the “Free At Last” sculpture in front of the Marsh chapel on Boston University’s campus. It is comprised of fifty doves flying in formation and is meant to represent peace in all fifty states. Dr. King attended BU in the 50s, graduating with his Doctor of Philosophy in 1955.
In light of today’s NH Primary, I thought I’d feature a new Twitter profile rather than just a single Tweet like I normally do. Recently, I’ve been following @LOLGOP and I think those with Liberal tendencies will enjoy this profile.
LOLGOP’s Twitter profile reads, “When you go from Eisenhower to Nixon to Reagan to W. to Palin to Bachmann to Perry to Cain to Newt to Santorum, it must be difficult to believe in evolution.” Never really thought of it that way but for those familiar with the individuals referenced it does seem like a regression and could just about convince me that evolution may indeed be a theory as several of those mentioned above believe.
Here is an example of one of @LOLGOP recent Tweets:
The Facebook profile is also pretty funny for those of you who may enjoy this sort of thing but are not using Twitter. Recent comments on the LOLGOP wall seem to include both political commentary and humor including these gems.
Santorum – n. a likely result of abstinence education
Mitt Romney attending a very early meeting of the Entitlement Society
Sarah Palin is in the middle of a run on sentence she began when she was 17
Earlier this week I wrote a post entitled, Why Massachusetts drives Conservatives crazy, which listed several attributes about my home state that I think should be emulated rather than ridiculed. Following the post, it was brought to my attention that earlier this past fall Massachusetts was ranked the most energy efficient state in the United States by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), a private research group.
The article which was reported in USA Today provides some highlights and national trends. Massachusetts success is attributed to a 2008 Cap and Trade bill Governor Patrick signed after his predecessor, Gov. Mitt Romney, vetoed it in 2007. An Inside Climate News article reports the Massachusetts legislation has created 3,800 jobs and nearly $500 million in economic activity in the last four years in my state. You can read more about how Massachusetts has channeled its investments to help make it the most energy efficient state here.
No doubt, attributing MA success to Cap and Trade legislation will prove to be one more reason Conservatives will find fault with and taunt Massachusetts regardless of the results it has apparently yielded.
Massachusetts has long been viewed (and probably rightfully so) as one of the most liberal states in the nation. Social activists, academia, and politicians from Massachusetts have been a strong and consistent voice for the Left in a nation that is increasingly center Right.
“We’re thinking of having a Massachusetts rally at some point in New Hampshire, sort of a please don’t turn America into Massachusetts” – Newt Gingrich, December 2011
Conservatives nash their teeth and say “Massachusetts” as a pejorative, and the current Republican Presidential candidates are no exception. But all kidding aside, what is it that bothers Conservatives? Here’s a quick look at some of the things that I think makes my state one to be emulated rather than ridiculed.
Massachusetts unemployment rate (while still too high) has consistently remained well below the national average (currently the Massachusetts unemployment rate is 7%). While this isn’t the lowest – for states with a sizable population (5 million or more) only Maryland, Minnesota and Virginia have lower unemployment rates. (Source)
No matter how you measure it, Massachusetts has one of the healthiest populations with one of the lowest rates of obesity and fewest smokers. In 2006, we became the first (and only) state to mandate universal healthcare so all residents have access to health insurance. (Source)
Despite claims MA is destroying American families (MA was the first state to legalize same sex marriage in 2004), we have the lowest divorce rate in the US (1.8% per 1,000 people). (Source)
Massachusetts is one of the wealthiest states in the country (by the way that means we have less people as a percentage of our population relying on welfare and other social programs Conservatives seem to hate so much). (Source) It also happens to be one of the few states to see childhood poverty rates drop last year. (Source)
One reason Massachusetts may be so wealthy is because as a percentage of the population, more people in our state hold a college degree than any other (not including Washington D.C.), making our state’s population one of the most highly educated in the US. (Source)
Massachusetts has its share of problems and has made terrible mistakes in the past, but we are learning from them and leading the nation by many measures. So the next time you hear a Conservative bashing Massachusetts, pause and ask them what exactly about the quality of life we have here bothers them so much.
Former Minnesota Senate majority leader Amy Koch has been a vocal opponent of gay marriage. She tried (unsuccessfully) to amend her state constitution to add language that would make marriage between a man and a woman. Last week this powerful politician announced she’d be stepping down as the majority leader and would not seek re-election in November.
What was the cause of her departure from the State Senate?
I don’t know if I should applaud or gag at Republican nominee hopeful, Newt Gingrich’s response to a gay Iowan who asked him ” if he’s elected, how does he plan to engage gay Americans.” Newt’s response “vote for Obama.”
I no longer apologize for who I am. I’ll follow Newt’s advice
Gingrich has gone so far in recent days to indicate that if President, he would not follow judicial rulings he disagreed with and would have such “activist judges” arrested – for example federal judges who rule in favor of same sex marriage he would deem “activist”.
Interesting that there are many in the gay community who bemoan the GLBT community is beholden to the far from perfect Democratic Party, but when provided the Newt alternative, I’m curious how this is perceived as a choice? If Newt was asked the same question but in place of the word “gay” the person asked “Woman”, “Black”, “Latino” or “Jewish” I wonder what the public’s response would be if he told them “vote for Obama”? You and I both know he’d be labelled a misogynist, racist or antisemitic; so in my opinion the current Republican nominee front runner is homophobic. Bravo Republican party… now you have a candidate proud to wear the badge of discrimination and hate. Two Christian values that seem so appropriate for this time of year.
I’ve never pretended to be a fan of Fox News but when they have made obvious errors in labeling or identifying geographies I’ve refrained from poking fun, acknowledging that everyone makes mistakes. However these errors seem to be happening with greater frequency on Fox News. Can you imagine a national news channel covering the Presidential Primary making errors like this? The errors shown have happened in the last two weeks; I’m not picking out errors over several months sorting through a proverbial haystack to find these.
This is the kind of thing I would expect to see on a regional network news affiliate in a minor market or perhaps from the Colbert Report on the Comedy Channel (which strangely often mocks the Fox News channel).
Fox News has been criticized for not checking their facts and perverting news to fit a political agenda. It appears the lack of discipline in their reporting is now spilling over to their preparation for their broadcasts in more tangible ways.
The images above are from Media Matters
Do elections matter? To quote an infamous American politician, “You betcha!” Yesterday, Hillary Clinton made news when she addressed the United Nations in Geneva and publicly declared the US will fight discrimination against gay and lesbians abroad by using foreign aid and diplomacy to encourage reform. Do I think that Saudi Arabia will stop beheading Gay men? I doubt it, but I do believe her and think this is more than just rhetoric.
Can you imagine this change in policy if John McCain won the last Presidential election? I can’t. When Hillary Clinton says to the UN, “Being gay is not a western invention, it is a human reality” it sends a message that being gay is okay to millions of men and women living in nations where they are persecuted, bullied, beaten and killed.
Did you know in more than 80 countries it is illegal to be gay? Source
The national debate on immigration has taken a nasty turn in recent years, and with a Presidential election in 2012, I assume the rhetoric will only get nastier. First the State of Arizona passed an immigration law that was nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to legalize discrimination against Mexicans in the spring of 2010. Then in June 2011, Alabama passed an even more restrictive immigration law, which interestingly has resulted in an excellent article by NPR called, “Have the crackdowns on immigration gone too far?”
Strangely, many who support these extreme (if not illegal) new immigration laws use very patriotic language. However, I always am tempted to ask these supporters if they’ve forgotten what is etched on our very own Statue of Liberty.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
I recognize that the United States cannot simply open their doors and must better track people, but at our core – our national identity was built upon what is etched on the Statue of Liberty and we’d be wise to remember that. The AZ and AL laws seem to forget or find that an inconvenient truth.
Since Senator Scott Brown took office in 2010, he has done a good job courting media and honing his image, but I’m not a fan, and I will not be voting for him next year. A new advert from the League of Conservation Voters points to a cozy relationship Brown has developed with big oil. So much for being a voice for the people or a champion for the environment.
In addition to his poor environmental record, Brown has continued to largely ignore the gay community in MA. Brown’s questionable environmental and LGBT ratings really are troublesome, but the fact that he’s done little to work with Obama and play the role of a negotiator who can go between both parties to help break the gridlock is perhaps what I find most disappointing. I thought his image as a “moderate” meant that he’d play a leading role like Sen. Snowe (ME) or the former Sen. Chaffee (RI). However he’s opted to fall lock-step with the Republican leadership. What a pity, because had he opted another path he could have truly been a “maverick” and made a difference while elevating the profile of the distinguished seat he currently represents.
Do I have high expectations from Sen Brown? Absolutely and so should you.
Most of those who oppose same sex marriage hide behind thinly veiled prejudices shrouded in moral overtones that reek of discrimination. Am I a one issue-voter; absolutely not, but if you are not in favor of same-sex marriage you probably won’t get my vote. Moreover, I’ll have a tough time respecting you and will likely work to financially support those who will run against you.