Now that the Republican Presidential primary season has essentially ended, President Obama’s re-election team has released this video.
Comments or questions? Contact BosGuy
- Follow BosGuy on WordPress.com
Find A Post on BosGuy
Now that the Republican Presidential primary season has essentially ended, President Obama’s re-election team has released this video.
Could the Occupy Movement’s theme of “fairness” be resonating? Frustration with executive pay and income disparity is a cornerstone to this movement, and part of the reason their protests took off in 2011.
Yesterday CitiGroup became the first major business that I’m aware of to get a “thumbs down” over proposed compensation for approving pay for its CEO by it’s share holders. The embarrassing snub to Vikram Pandit’s pay is not quite a trend but it is noteworthy considering this is one of Wall Street’s and our nation’s largest companies.
Considering the horrible job Pandit has done the snub hardly seems to be without merit. In 2011 Pandit’s pay was $14.8 million. If this was a Tweet, I’d feel compelled to end it with #Occupy, because as more time passes the more I sympathize and identify with this movement.
The depths of despicability NOM has sunk is not news, nor is the fact that Mitt Romney donated $10,000 to this organization a few years ago .
What is news is the growing divide between corporate America and Romney. His support of organizations like NOM shows his “business-friendly” policies are limited to tax breaks only. To paraphrase Microsoft, Romney’s views and support of NOM are “bad for business.”
Microsoft’s support for LGBT marriage equality in WA
Microsoft is by no means alone in their opposition to organizations like NOM. Many of our country’s largest and most admired firms (e.g. Apple, Starbucks, TJX, etc) have become more outspoken for marriage equality and LGBT acceptance. In recent years, these firms have shifted from providing a ‘welcome’ workplace to advocating for LGBT rights.
Romney’s support for NOM deserves your disdain.
If asked, no I’m not a huge fan of Obama’s but I’ll take my chances with a candidate who isn’t bankrolling organizations like NOM. Screw the economy, I have bigger issues like dignity and personal pride – voting for a candidate who supports organizations like NOM is bad for American business and even worse for those hoping for a more inclusive America.
I’ve been openly critical of Senator Scott Brown’s lack of dialog with the LGBT community. No matter how you slice the demographics, MA has one of the largest LGBT populations in the country so to categorically ignore such a vocal and politically active constituency has made no sense.
Compound his total silence to date with the fact that his predecessor (the late Sen. Kennedy) not only maintained open dialog with the LGBT community but was also a huge champion and leader of LGBT rights. To have such sudden and unwanted silence from our US Senator has been more than disappointing – its been disconcerting.
You may read Senator Brown’s guest opinion in Bay Windows, but if you cannot get access to a hard copy it is also available online here.
In the guest opinion, Senator Brown describes how he approached such important LGBT votes like DADT (by the way his support was crucial). He spends a fair amount of time addressing how much he and President Obama agree and have worked together which is rather refreshing to hear in an age of party bickering, but I’m not won over yet. I’m still unsettled by a US Senator who has treated me and my community like we are invisible and my vote is still firmly for Elizabeth Warren.
Last week I wrote about confidential documents from the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) made public in my post here. These documents detailed a blueprint written by NOM to drive a wedge between gays and blacks with a “divide and conquer” strategy.
NOM has been considered a fringe group from the beginning. Their rhetoric and techniques have made them notorious and for that reason only the most virulent opponents to same sex marriage have associated themselves with this organization.
Mitt Romney’s support of NOM is shameful
It was both surprising and disappointing to learn last Friday in 2008 Mitt Romney donated $10,000 to NOM. With scores of organizations opposing same sex marriage, Romney could and did financially support many organizations opposing marriage equality. So why did he feel the need to also provide such a generous donation to NOM? Political posturing? His belief in NOM? Regardless Mitt Romney’s support of NOM is shameful.
Today is April Fools’ Day. A day many use as an excuse to play all kinds of jokes and foolishness. While the day is meant for pranksters and all in good fun, not all jokes are funny and sometimes a Fool really can try one’s patience.
Who is the bigger fool these candidates
or the men and women looking to them to lead our nation?
So I thought I’d share three fools who I’ve lost my patience with and who I no longer laugh or jest about. These three men in particular have successfully moved the political dialog in the United States so far to the right that I no longer can bear the thought of any of them.
These three men have dashed so far to the right that their meaningless debates have been about topics like should birth control be made available, initiating a war with Iran and building colonies on the moon – no joke. If I had told friends likely to vote Republican in the next election these would be the topics dominating Republican debates I’m fairly certain I could have wagered them all $100 (or maybe I should’ve bet $10,000 as Romney did to Gov. Perry in one debate).
NOM protester from anti-gay marriage rally from 2010
On Monday in Maine the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) released confidential documents from the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). These documents were shared as evidence in Maine’s ongoing ethics investigation into NOM’s campaign finances.
According to the articles from TruthWinsOut.org and Human Rights Campaign these documents were part of a continuing investigation by the state of Maine. The court-ordered disclosure shows how NOM’s strategy and tactics are racially and ethnically divisive and filled with false political calculations.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, personal opinions may vary on the morality of sexual identity / orientation, but legally everyone must be treated fairly under the law. A law that restricts the freedoms of one group over another will eventually find itself on the wrong side of history, and those opposing same sex marriage will be remembered by history with scorn.
This past weekend I attended a wedding, and the justice of the peace pointed out while the tradition of marriage is not new, the two getting married were among the first generation of gay men in the US to legally wed each other. So I wanted to take a quick moment to recognize the two grooms, Jason and Randy who invited me to bear witness to their ceremony and say, “Thank you.”
Their reasons for marrying had little to do with politics and more to do with a desire to build a life together, but their actions taken in context of a larger trend show that as more men and women come out of the closet and come together the taboo of being “gay” is disappearing. Massachusetts would have never legalized gay marriage in 2004 had it not been for the tens of thousands of gay men and women who stepped out from the closet in the 70s, 80s, 90s and even recently.
For those living in places where being gay is still “bad” or “wrong” I hope you read this post and can see your future in the life Jason and Randy are now starting together. No matter where you live in this country, the laws are changing because the public’s perception of what it means to be gay is changing, and a lot of that is due to men like Jason and Randy who are just living the American Dream with a bit of a gay twist.
Have you seen this touching video about Brian and Alfonso? Their story is yet to be fully written, and it is a reminder that elections do matter. While my story is quite different it is not lost on me that for many conservatives in the Democratic Party and virtually all of the Republican Party, Brian and Alfonso don’t matter.
I don’t know about you, but this sort of thing outrages me
By extension of that same logic I don’t matter nor does my relationship with my partner. My government allows someone to marry a stranger from another country and would provide that person all the benefits of a US citizen, but couples who have spent more than a decade together can be ripped apart simply because they share the same anatomy. It makes me ashamed and outraged. Learn more here
Last year’s Arab spring led to toppling several long standing dictatorships. Unfortunately the Arab spring has turned into what looks like a civil war in Syria. Horrible reports are regularly broadcast about how children are being targeted and how the army is bombing hospitals so the wounded cannot be tended to. I’ve had to stop watching the news because it is so upsetting.
For those who follow world events, what I’m writing is not news and for those who may not be aware, I assume its because you have a lack of interest (hopefully not sympathy) in these people’s plight. Watching the lack of any meaningful response from the U.N. and more importantly from neighbors in the region like Turkey, I’m left to surmise if evil does exist it must manifest in situations like this.
Candidate Mitt Romney seems to have multiple personalities. If you happen to live in any of the states holding Republican Presidential Primaries or Caucuses today, you probably won’t hear anything nearly as friendly from Romney. Lately. he’s jumped at the opportunity to show his “Conservative Credentials”.
I wonder why his competitors have not seized this opportunity to illustrate his hypocrisy? I suppose there are probably just too many other examples, but I couldn’t help but laugh when I saw this image which was posted on Spirit Magazine’s website. If you find this funny, check out James Lopata’s humorous article, Top 10 Gay Reasons to Vote GOP in 2012.
Tip O’Neill was an outspoken liberal politician from Massachusetts who is attributed with the quote “all politics is local“. So when I read The Advocate’s article, “A most-wanted list: Mayors not for marriage”, I started thinking about how important it is to have the support of a sitting mayor. Not only can they be a huge advocate, but more importantly they have a strong network of volunteers and community leaders within the city they represent.
Mayors from some of our largest cities have already pledged their support for same sex marriage. Mayors from cities like New York City, Washington D.C., and Boston have proven to be staunch supporters. However it is in states where same sex marriage remains illegal that mayors can make a huge difference.
The Wikipedia page Supporters of Same-Sex Marriage lists elected officials who support the right to marry. Using that list and the Advocate article, I’ve compiled a list of mayors who have not pledged their support. Take a moment to share this with friends and if you live in one of these cities reach out to your mayor. If any of this information is incorrect or if I’m missing a mayor you would like added, please leave a comment.
Ever since seeing Idina Menzel perform on the Atlantis Cruise earlier this month I’ve found myself thinking about her very handsome husband, Taye Diggs.
I remember the first time I ever saw him in the late 90s movie How Stella Got Her Groove Back where he played the role of the young, Jamaican lover of the much older Stella Payne played by Angela Bassett. His career has spanned television, movies and Broadway. It was his role in a little off Broadway musical called Rent where he met his wife, Idina. Taye has recently added the role of father when his son was born a few years ago. His new role as Dad has done nothing to diminish his sex appeal and he continues to distract me.
I couldn’t have said it better myself Anne. Thanks for being a decent human being. Now if we can just get a few more decent people together to end all this indecency.
Posted in Gay, Poltics, Pop Culture
Tagged BosGuy, Boston Guy, Gay, Politics, Pop Culture